Skip to main content
MutualFundsByCAGR logoMutualFundsByCAGR

Best Ultra Short to Short Term Fund Mutual Funds

Short, Low and Ultra Short Duration funds hold bonds maturing within roughly three years. Shorter maturities mean less sensitivity to interest-rate moves than long-duration debt.

We currently track 27 direct-plan Ultra Short to Short Term Fund schemes from 25 fund houses with a median 5-year CAGR of 6.6%. Every figure below is calculated from official daily NAV history and refreshed each day. Use the column headers to re-rank the table by any period — the best 1-year performer is often not the best over 5 or 10 years, which is exactly why we default to the longer horizon.

Showing 27 of 27 schemes · sorted by Y5 high to low · page 1 of 1

Rank by1Y CAGR3Y CAGR5Y CAGR10Y CAGR
Sort by1M6M1Y3Y5Y, sorted high to low10Y

Ultra Short to Short Term Fund funds — frequently asked questions

Which Ultra Short to Short Term Fund fund has the highest 5-year CAGR?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra short to short term Fund - Direct Plan - GROWTH currently leads the Ultra Short to Short Term Fund category with a 5-year CAGR of 6.8%. Past returns describe what already happened and do not predict future performance — treat the ranking as a starting point for research, not a recommendation.

What is a good 5-year return for a Ultra Short to Short Term Fund fund?

Across the 27 Ultra Short to Short Term Fund schemes we track, the median 5-year CAGR is 6.6%. Comparing a fund against that median, rather than against the category's single best performer, is a more realistic benchmark.

How is CAGR calculated on this page?

CAGR is the compound annual growth rate between the NAV on the horizon start date and the latest NAV, using growth-plan NAVs published by the AMCs. Where a scheme's NAV history has a gap or a re-denomination, we adjust for it rather than report a distorted figure. Expense ratios are already reflected in NAV; exit loads and taxes are not.

Why does this list only show direct plans?

Direct plans have no distributor commission, so their expense ratio is lower and their NAV growth is higher than the regular plan of the same scheme. Showing both would list every fund twice, so we rank direct plans only.