Skip to main content
MutualFundsByCAGR logoMutualFundsByCAGR

Best FoF (Overseas) Mutual Funds

Overseas Fund of Funds invest in units of foreign funds, giving rupee investors exposure to international markets. Returns depend on both the underlying market and the rupee's movement against that currency.

We currently track 56 direct-plan FoF (Overseas) schemes from 19 fund houses with a median 5-year CAGR of 14.5%. Every figure below is calculated from official daily NAV history and refreshed each day. Use the column headers to re-rank the table by any period — the best 1-year performer is often not the best over 5 or 10 years, which is exactly why we default to the longer horizon.

Showing 50 of 56 schemes · sorted by Y5 low to high · page 1 of 2

Rank by1Y CAGR3Y CAGR5Y CAGR10Y CAGR
Sort by1M6M1Y3Y5Y, sorted low to high10Y

FoF (Overseas) funds — frequently asked questions

Which FoF (Overseas) fund has the highest 5-year CAGR?

Mirae Asset NYSE FANG+ ETF currently leads the FoF (Overseas) category with a 5-year CAGR of 27.8%. Past returns describe what already happened and do not predict future performance — treat the ranking as a starting point for research, not a recommendation.

What is a good 5-year return for a FoF (Overseas) fund?

Across the 56 FoF (Overseas) schemes we track, the median 5-year CAGR is 14.5%. Comparing a fund against that median, rather than against the category's single best performer, is a more realistic benchmark.

How is CAGR calculated on this page?

CAGR is the compound annual growth rate between the NAV on the horizon start date and the latest NAV, using growth-plan NAVs published by the AMCs. Where a scheme's NAV history has a gap or a re-denomination, we adjust for it rather than report a distorted figure. Expense ratios are already reflected in NAV; exit loads and taxes are not.

Why does this list only show direct plans?

Direct plans have no distributor commission, so their expense ratio is lower and their NAV growth is higher than the regular plan of the same scheme. Showing both would list every fund twice, so we rank direct plans only.